any1 watched?
+ pluses:
i am super glad they did not do woke casting, would have ruined the immersion
the scene transition & the love story are more fluid than the 1981 version
- minuses:
the gamemaster was no bodacious nicholas clay 4 sure
dialogues & demeanor r rather modern, lacking the grace & social context of the 1981 version
the movie painted the disabled husband as the villain, so the movie comes off strangely cruel toward disabled ppl since it tried 2 b woke, modern, & 2022
very feminist, yet the girl was made 2 exposed more w/ more nude scene
also, somehow, it is showing the girl being bored of men talking about politics & econ, it is rather anti-feminist and made her looks stupid
finally, the movie shown the girl taking care of her post-war disabled husband & it seems like so much of a burden, that her sister screamed 4 the husband 2 get his own personal caregiver. The wedding vow includes in sickness & in health 4 a reason ladies. In the 1981 version, lady chatterley was by the husband's side 2 take care of him without grievance, and only tagged a nurse in when the husband got worse. There was more realistic tenderness between the chatterley couple in 1981.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 31 | December 12, 2022 5:10 AM |
Is there male nudity?
That's all we care about, OP.
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | December 4, 2022 6:45 AM |
'The girl'?
There have also been at least three other versions since the 1981 film.
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | December 4, 2022 6:46 AM |
[quote]u type like a child op
OP types with one hand while masturbating with the other.
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | December 4, 2022 6:47 AM |
[quote] i am super glad they did not do woke casting
The creature playing Lady Chatterley claims to be a non-woman.
But does the audience get to see her damaged vagina and muzzled mammies?
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | December 4, 2022 6:50 AM |
R2 r6 yes, of course, it's lady chatterley, full frontal is expected
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | December 4, 2022 2:22 PM |
I’m not going to watch a film about a woman who is a wanton slut engaging in adultery.
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | December 4, 2022 2:47 PM |
Some Nicholas Clay clean the arteries...
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 9 | December 4, 2022 2:54 PM |
Does anybody remember the anaemic(sexless) BBC version a couple a couple of years ago with Richard Madden? You really wondered what the point was.
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | December 4, 2022 3:02 PM |
2 lure ppl in w/ false premise of soft core porn r10
| by Anonymous | reply 11 | December 5, 2022 12:05 AM |
[quote] You really wondered what the point was.
Not much.
The plot of "Lady Chatterley's Lover" lasts 360 pages of waffle in the book format.
Hemingway could have told the same story in 50 pages.
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | December 5, 2022 12:40 AM |
Yes, he would have shot himself before finishing.
Oh, wait. He did.
| by Anonymous | reply 13 | December 5, 2022 6:54 AM |
Terrible film. Stick with the Nicolas Clay version.
| by Anonymous | reply 14 | December 5, 2022 7:05 AM |
Yes R14! Gorgeous man.
And the divine Sylvia Kristel (also starred in Emanuelle). She shacked up with Ian MacShane but I think he beat her or something. Or they drank/drugged up too much. She has a miscarriage - they split up. Anyway... loved Ian - sad to read he was a jerk.
| by Anonymous | reply 15 | December 5, 2022 7:09 AM |
[quote][R2] [R6] yes, of course, it's lady chatterley, full frontal is expected
There’s full frontal male nudity?
| by Anonymous | reply 18 | December 5, 2022 10:40 AM |
The sexy dude is Cook from Skins.
| by Anonymous | reply 20 | December 5, 2022 3:16 PM |
I was just going through puberty when the last one was shown on TV and I think I jerked off to the memory of the games keeper’s ass for the next 10 years.
| by Anonymous | reply 21 | December 5, 2022 3:43 PM |
If it weren’t for this reboot I would never have found out about the Nicholas Clay version with its long, loving, lingering footage of his ass all wet and soapy. Hallelujah! How did I get this far in life without seeing that!
| by Anonymous | reply 22 | December 7, 2022 1:24 AM |
Why do they always have to use prosthetics? First Theo James and now this.
| by Anonymous | reply 23 | December 7, 2022 8:22 AM |
That is his real dong, as he has shown it before and is not afraid to let his unmutilated dong hang out for the world to see.
| by Anonymous | reply 24 | December 7, 2022 8:46 AM |
Slow but worth watching just to see the lover naked
| by Anonymous | reply 25 | December 7, 2022 10:35 AM |
I stopped after "Woke." Did OP like it?
| by Anonymous | reply 26 | December 7, 2022 11:29 AM |
I remember the BBC adaptation around 1993. I was a horny 14 year old who watched it on the tv in my room (with the volume turned right down so my parents didn’t catch me) and remember being rewarded by an all too brief glimpse of Sean Bean’s cock. He was really hot back then and, frankly, he still is now in a rough as nails kinda way. Ahh, memories.
| by Anonymous | reply 27 | December 7, 2022 11:40 AM |
These people aren’t hot enough. And I used to think Emma Corrin was faking the hole non-binary thing for attention, but she does have a certain mannish quality about her, so I suppose it makes sense.
| by Anonymous | reply 28 | December 11, 2022 5:12 PM |
Ian McShane was sexy beast but, yes, treated women like shit.
| by Anonymous | reply 30 | December 11, 2022 6:42 PM |
R30 Nothing wrong with that.
| by Anonymous | reply 31 | December 12, 2022 5:10 AM |
